User:John Bessa/GO: group outcomes
This "wikified lesson" is written for post-patient recovery. As such, everything in it can be viewed in terms of successful adaption through the group process by patients who have been emancipated from institutions, or, conversely, unfortunate maladaption. It is not, however, about group psychology, as nearly everything in it has been gleaned from group organizational resources that hope to help improve work productivity. As such, the structure here should apply in nearly any group environment.
The "thinking" that had previously been done on behalf of the emancipated patients by others, such as health-care aides, now needs to be done by the group members as individuals. As you will see, however, there are no individuals in the emerging group context. Also within this paradox is the challenge for the helper to "let go," to be a facilitator, and to trust in the natural interrelation system, which is empathy.
Keywords: group, emergent, distal, proximal, task, process, relationship
Note: this document is also available for printing (and corporate distribution) in ms word doc format: GO_Group_outcomes.docx
Group outcomes
editGroup outcomes depend on individuals' satisfaction and commitment to stay resulting from group efficacy in the proximal dimension, where success, or agency, is currently described as group emergence
- Task interrelation
- Proximal emergence
- Distal agency
Important to emergence is the health of group members' relationships so as to mediate the group's processes and thus beneficial group outcomes
Dimensions (states)
edit- emergent
- efficacy
- proximal
- task
- process
- relationships
- distal
- agency
Emergent dimension (group dynamism)
edit- personal satisfaction
- commitment
- motivation
- trust
- interrelation
- understanding
- distal outcomes (agency)
Emergent task mediated by group values
editInterdependence beyond structure
- unspecified
- open
- suggests that friendships help outcomes
Task-interdependence
edit- high-quality interpersonal relations
- extensive learning from each other
- shared responsibility for performance outcomes
What emergence is not
- independent
- no close interaction
Low emergence characteristics
- no shared activity
- unharmonious
- Learning from others is rare
- Individuals are motivated to self-develop expertise to impress others
- skills
- knowledge
Individual paradox
- Group emergence is often defined in terms of emerging leadership
- how an individual can exploit outcomes by destroying group values (Lewis Mumford)
Proximal (state)
editProximal emergent states are based on relationships
- intragroup trust
- group cohesion
Viability (as measured individually)
- satisfaction
- commitment
- identification
- organizational citizenship
- positive affect
Performance (links to distal state)
- innovativeness
- decision quality
- efficacy
- effectivness
Proximal functions
edit- task
- process
- relationship
Task
editThe action of emergence is described in terms of the emergent task
Task types
editCreativity tasks, which require
- idea generation,
- innovation, research, and/or
- development of new ideas
Decision-making (emergence leadership)
- develop direction
- without known path
Project tasks
- problem solving
- generating plans
Activity tasks
- routine
- physical
- intellectual
- quality standards
Process (activity, existential)
edit- creating better life outcomes (making change happen) in small steps as part of tasks
- process experiences in the context of community to prevent isolation (and thus depression)
- open processes (allowing and embracing new members)
- processing in the context of the group's values
as a group task
- meaning
- definition
- tangible outcome
achieved through
- social interrelation
- learning
Process mediation (facilitation)
edit- help a process move along
Mediation questions
- what mediates the processes?
- what is the purpose of the group?
- what processes (activities) achieve the purpose?
Group process mediates conflict
editIn-groups/out-groups
- in-groups -- sub-groups within the super-set group (organization)
- no external out-groups, so the super-set may be named as an out-group
- marginalizing the central organization from group membership
- if factions develop (through relationships) out-groups may be named
- suggests where friendships may be damage outcomes
Individuals
- isolation
- self-development (to impress others)
- marginalization
Distal process
editActivity assurance
edit- effort
- planned
- actual
- value proportion
- benefits
- budget
- compliance
- emergent values
- benefits
Relationship
editGroup
- friendships
- resources
- labor
- status hierarchies
Friendships
- self-disclosure
- similarity
- emotions
- activity types
Intra-group
editIn-group
- we-ness
- open or closed to new members
Out-group as viewed by in-group
- no identification with other group (thought may be same)
- fear creates conflict
Friendship relationships
- least exclusive
- partnership style similarities
- communication
- roles
- labor
- resources
- activity styles
- communication
Distal (state)
edit- perceptions of the group from others
- production
- quality
- values
Conflict (proximal)
editLarge negative effects
- proximal
- distal
- exception: certain tasks at certain times
Poorest conflict outcomes
- process
- relationship
Conflict paradox
edit- potential to benefit a broad variety of group outcomes
- impairs both proximal and distal group outcomes
Task conflict surrounds the task
edit- content,
- opinions
- ideas
can help
- start
- preparation
- choices of actions
as proximal evaluations of
- processes
- tasks
- resources
- standards
Counterproductive when tasks are
- well-understood
- straightforward
Task conflict
editArises with assignments
- task below expertise
- personal insult
Task conflict has fewer
- negative emotions
- personal connotations
- not necessarily disruptive for group outcomes
- often indicates success (respect others' POV)
Process conflict
editConflict and self-verification theory
Challenges are interpreted as negative assessments
- dissatisfaction
- stress
- rumination
- maintaining depression
Might improve group outcomes
- who
does
- what?
and
- how things are done
Relationship conflicts
edit- proximal and unmanageable,
- tend to destroy emergence outcome
Resulting from
- defensible threat (historically called ego)
- hostility
- intentions to leave
Lost are
- identification
- trust
- member commitment
Relationship paradox
- Friendships/partnerships are least exclusive
- mediate openness
- Form factions
- mediate in-group/out-group conflict
- organizational level
- mediate in-group/out-group conflict
Approaches
editfound using the keywords for searches from the keywords: group, emergent, distal, proximal, task, relationship, process
Developmental
editDevelopmental Psychopathology, Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation by Dante Cicchetti and Donald J. Cohen
During the childhood years, early relationships with primary caregivers affect several emerging psychological attributes and influence the negotiation of major developmental tasks; resolution of these tasks, in turn, ... On the positive side, strong relationships with those in one's proximal circle serve vital protective processes, for children as well as adults. ... factors that (in addition to the universals, such as warmth and discipline) are especially salient in particular ethnic minority groups.
Emotional
editThe Regulation of Emotion by Pierre Philippot, Robert Stephen Feldman
At the group level, it is necessary to distinguish one's ingroup from the outgroup for the purposes of coalition forming and resource distribution. ... In particular, positive emotions serve informative functions relevant to this relationship task. ... roles (e.g., teacher-student or coworker), emotions are one important proximal mechanism by which this task is completed. ... During this process, emergent properties of the relationship itself are developed — qualities not of the individuals, but the group itself.
Learning
editSocial and Emotional Aspects of Learning by Sanna Järvelä
The interaction unfolds presumably within the novice's zone of proximal development, namely with one of the ... theory that views thinking as a socially distributed process, with knowledge emerging form the language-mediated collaborative ... length of the task required to be done together, a parameter that affects the degree of involvement and relationship within the group.
Cultural preservation of/for the aging
editHandbook of Adulthood and Aging by Susan Krauss Whitbourne and Martin Sliwinski
It is a process in which groups or organizations are guided towards preservation of culture or traditions. ... is taken up in two quite different ways: initially in terms of proximal family issues, and later in terms of other distal social roles. ... The period of emerging adulthood is distinct in five ways: It is an age of increased identity explorations and instability, ... is not linear, and that the process of identity formation and consolidation is a lifelong task.
Neural
editStroke Recovery and Rehabilitation by Joel Stein
These processes are thought to represent the synaptic mechanisms responsible for learning and memory. ... The first study to directly examine this relationship used varying behaviorally demanding tasks to selectively activate specific ... These movements consisted of simultaneous executions of digit and wrist, or proximal movements at low ICMS thresholds, and ... the syndactyly, the new multi-digit representations appear as an emergent property of the plastic somatosensory cortex.
And even political
editPolitics in Organizations by Gerald R. Ferris, Darren C. Treadway
Emergent states can be considered both as team inputs and proximal outcomes. as inputs, emergent states may affect different team-level processes such as the political behaviors of team members. as an example of an emergent state and its relationship ... in the group” and was claimed to consist of three facets (i.e., member attraction,group activities or task commitment) and prestige or group pride.